Sergei has fallen into a circle of producing horse shit (I apologize for the term but I am merely borrowing words from Sergei' literary treasure) and uncontrollable anger.
Everything about Sergei indicates that he is a newcomer to the political arena (welcome Sergei). And as every novice does, he defines things in his own little way to draw inconsistent twisted conclusions. For example, let's agree with Sergei for a moment that apartheid is only about racial discrimination. Arab Israeli citizens enjoy more rights than most Arabs do elsewhere in the Arab world. Therefore Arabs in the occupied territory could not be discriminated on the basis of race only. This makes "Israeli apartheid" a misnomer if we want to go by Sergei's lexicon. Let's not confuse things. Adding or removing the "apartheid" label doesn't make heinous acts suddenly more or less heinous, especially if the term is used to draw conclusions or absurd comparisons as Sergei does. Peel apart little Sergei's line of reasoning and you find the following absurd universe:
Apartheid bad, Israel apartheid, Islamic regime not apartheid, Israel has nuclear weapons --> Israel bad, Israel much worse than Islamic regime, Islamic Regime should have even more weapons than Israel!
On a related note: I've lost count of the number of times the Middle Eastern tyrants have promised to throw Jews into the sea or to wipe Israel off the map.
Another funny thing about this novice is that he is now the ultimate judge on whether or not Iran (with or without mullahs) should possess nuclear arsenal or power plants. In many parts of the world, issues such as this especially if they involve putting nuclear reactors near residential areas are discussed at length openly and free of coercion, censorship, and intimidation to let all voices and concerns be heard: from safety of the reactors to the geopolitical implications of such move and so many other things. In Iran, Ahmadinejad banned any discussion about uranium enrichment suspension and now little Serge with his fatwa!
Little Sergei pretends that IAEA and Al Baradei are all on the side of mullahs, another sign of his ignorance. Al Baradei's point has all along been that Iran is taking full advantage of IAEA's loopholes. Al Baradei has his set of roles and responsibilities and the IAEA governing council has its. How do you think Iran's case was brought in the security council?
Khomeini once said, "I am not a sportsman but I like sportsmen". Sergei said I am not an Islamic regime agent but perhaps he likes Islamic regime agents.
continues from here...